Wagon speaks for itself.

I like it

I especially like the tail lights. Sweet car.

nope.

Old parts/design on new cars..... not a fan. Leave the tri-5 design cues to the tri-5's.

Actually makes the rear bumper look better.

Not seeing it.

If it wasn't for the rear quarters, it would be a sweet ride. Where's the vomit smiley again?

Between the Impala SS scripts, the poorly radiused wheelswells, and the now-uglied lower trim, I'd say the best thing you could do for it was back it into something solid at a high rate of fuel consumption.

Then you would have an excuse to cut all that backyard restyling off and weld on new panels

At least it has a maroon interior so I won't feel bad when it gets crushed.

(Sorry, that just came out.)

- J

If they hadnt cut up the rear fenders it might look better but it just look cluttered with too many body mods!

never seen a woody impala ss ,. or a woody nomad for that matter,..


Nick

seen it in person, pictures make it look better, way much more better than it does in person.....

Now I know what that gynocologist did when he got home,he worked on this wagon!

Fail.
Four door nomad with Impala SS script???

It does look like they shaved the filler door. I wonder if it's in the correct place now...

They should have shaved or at least hidden the rear doors.

I like the back end - but then I am a sucker for older cars with fins and miss that styling element. Could it have been done better? sure - but for the constraints they had to work within this looks pretty nice.

YachtDriver wrote:

Fail.
Four door nomad with Impala SS script???

...made out of a Buick??

I see all these obvious things being pointed out but I still like the workmanship of it.

If they were going for a classic look...why did they cut out the rear wheel-wells?

My vote is....Different is good!

YachtDriver wrote:

Fail.
It does look like they shaved the filler door. I wonder if it's in the correct place now...

As I think you know Douglas, the gas filler on the 56's was behind the driver side tail light. It was on hinges and would swing out.

Tom

silverfox103 wrote:

YachtDriver wrote:

Fail.
It does look like they shaved the filler door. I wonder if it's in the correct place now...

As I think you know Douglas, the gas filler on the 56's was behind the driver side tail light. It was on hinges and would swing out.

Tom

Tom, Yes that is what I was referring to.

81X11 wrote:

If they were going for a classic look...why did they cut out the rear wheel-wells?

To make it look as bad as it possibly could?

Based on the tailgate trim they were going for the Nomad look and the '55 Nomads had open rear wheelwells.

Of course now that they are using the '56 taillights... Uh, nevermind.

- J

YachtDriver wrote:

silverfox103 wrote:

YachtDriver wrote:

Fail.
It does look like they shaved the filler door. I wonder if it's in the correct place now...

As I think you know Douglas, the gas filler on the 56's was behind the driver side tail light. It was on hinges and would swing out.

Tom

Tom, Yes that is what I was referring to.

Douglas, it did swing out, didn't it? Got thinking about it, and wasn't sure if something dropped down.

Tom

This is starting to sound like an old Johnny Cash song....... "...it was a 55,56,57,58,59 automobile......

Tom,
It swings down.
There is a latch at the top.

Thanks Doug

Wasn't quite sure. I had one 55 and three 57's, no 56's.

tom

JaySS wrote:

At least it has a maroon interior so I won't feel bad when it gets crushed.

(Sorry, that just came out.)

- J

Boo...hiss....lol

Wagon is kinda interesting, but I love a maroon interior in the right wagon. hahaa