steel-and-fire
Posts : 240
Join date : 2013-07-08
Age : 35
Location : Staten Island, NY
 | Subject: Interesting Comparison  Tue Jul 15, 2014 3:36 pm | |
| Just so happened to park beside a 95 Impala. More to the point, its amazing the sheet metal difference when one ended in 1990 and the next was restyled for the following year. I'm not even going to count the mechanical or electrical upgrades. Just one of those things that is in perspective. Also, in just the right spots to get a few pics.   | |
|
harrisons13
Posts : 156
Join date : 2014-01-16
Location : Long Beach CA
| | Subject: Re: Interesting Comparison Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:36 pm | |
| That's cool how different they look in this photo, I kinda think the wagon looks better. | |
|
JoeT
Posts : 680
Join date : 2010-03-06
Age : 67
Location : 48098
| | Subject: Re: Interesting Comparison Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:38 pm | |
| I agree; I think the 92-96 wagons look better than the sedans.
The length and the "lines" on the wagon are better proportioned, IMO. | |
|
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Interesting Comparison Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:14 pm | |
| - JoeT wrote:
- I agree; I think the 92-96 wagons look better than the sedans.
The length and the "lines" on the wagon are better proportioned, IMO. Good eye Joe!You are correct,how goes things with your GTO restoration? |
|
JoeT
Posts : 680
Join date : 2010-03-06
Age : 67
Location : 48098
| | Subject: Re: Interesting Comparison Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:29 pm | |
| Jim, I've been driving the GTO whenever the weather is nice.
I am working on the 32 Ford truck now.
Got the next one lined up, too.
More to follow on those two projects!
| |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Interesting Comparison | |
| |
|
